AA/PPS 03.01.01 - Contracts and Grants of an Academic Nature
Contracts and Grants of an Academic Nature
AA/PPS No. 03.01.01 (5.01)
Issue No. 2
Effective Date: 3/02/2018
Next Review Date: 10/01/2021 (ONY)
Sr. Reviewer: Associate Vice President for Research and Federal Relations
The following information establishes policies and procedures for the development and submission of contract and grant proposals of an academic nature. This includes proposals submitted to state, federal, private agencies, etc., through the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs (ORSP).
The principal investigator (PI), who may also be the project director, bears the primary responsibility for the accuracy of all the material in the proposal and for compliance with all applicable regulations, including those found in UPPS No. 02.02.01, Applying for Sponsored Programs.
The PI is responsible for informing the department chair or school director and dean of intent to submit prior to initiating a proposal.
The PI is responsible for the completion of the grant or contract proposal application according to specifications in the application guidelines and within the university’s proposal management system.
The PI checks all financial data with Pre-Award Support Services prior to submission of the grant or contract proposal through the university’s internal approval process.
The PI ensures that the proposal meets all compliance requirements (Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), Institutional Review Board (IRB), bio-safety, and others, as applicable); complies with affirmative action regulations, if applicable; significant financial interest disclosures as found in UPPS No. 02.02.07, Researcher Conflicts of Interest in Research and Sponsored Program Activities and UPPS No. 02.02.08, Conflicts of Commitment in Research and Sponsored Program Activities; and meets any other regulations that might apply, such as export controls and rules mandated by the Office of Safety and Health Administration, State Department, etc.
The PI is responsible for the quality in purpose, scope, and plan of operation, and for sharing credit with partnering departments or schools, as appropriate including the distribution of recovered indirect costs according to UPPS No. 03.04.05, Facilities and Administration Costs (F&A or Indirect)).
The PI ensures that a single proposal is not submitted to several funding sources simultaneously without prior notification to Pre-Award Support Services and all funders.
The PI informs Pre-Award Support Services if the targeted funding program allows only a limited number of submissions from the university. If multiple proposals are targeted at a program to which the university submissions are limited, it is the responsibility of ORSP to implement an internal review process to recommend the proposals for submission to the program as noted in AA/PPS No. 03.01.02, Limited Submissions for Certain Sponsored Programs.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT CHAIR OR SCHOOL DIRECTOR
The department chair or school director, or a named designee, verifies that the proposal purpose, scope, and plan of operation represent the best interests of the department or school.
The department chair or school director, or a named designee, verifies that they approve all requests for released time, major equipment purchases, information technology support, funds for clerical and research assistants, use and renovation of facilities, and proposed cost sharing.
The department chair or school director, or a named designee, verifies that any requests for additional staff lines have been discussed with the appropriate authority.
The department chair or school director, or a named designee, ensures that the regulations regarding nepotism (UPPS No. 04.04.07, Nepotism and Related Employment) are followed if the PI hires a family member.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE DEAN OF THE COLLEGE
The dean, or a named designee, reviews each proposal, paying particular attention to commitments incurred.
The dean, or a named designee, verifies that the proposal represents the best interests of the college.
The dean, or a named designee, verifies the proposal reflects credit on the college and its faculty.
The dean, or a named designee, verifies that they approve of all requests for released time, equipment purchases, information technology support, funds for clerical assistance, use of facilities, and expenditures for travel, and other uses of university resources, such as proposed cost sharing.
The dean, or a named designee, verifies that any requests for additional staff lines has their full approval.
The dean, or a named designee, answers questions concerning programmatic commitments.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND SPONSORED PROGRAMS
ORSP reviews each proposal submitted for completeness and accuracy to the best of its ability.
ORSP may return the proposal if there are any questions regarding the quality of the proposal or with factual accuracy.
Upon approval by the required parties, ORSP submits the proposal for consideration to the potential sponsor.
ORSP offers technical assistance in proposal development for all sponsored program funding requests.
SPONSORED PROGRAM PROPOSAL ROUTING PROCEDURES
Requests for approval of proposals and applications for contracts and grants of an academic nature must be made by utilizing the university’s proposal management system. The system will simultaneously route the proposals electronically to be approved to all appropriate parties, which include the following (not in any order):
department chair or school director;
dean of the academic college;
The Graduate College;
vice president for Institutional Technology or designee;
associate vice president for Research and Federal Relations or designee;
Texas State University System Office of the General Counsel;
director, Environment Health, Safety & Risk Management or designee;
associate vice president for Facilities or designee;
vice president for Student Affairs or designee;
vice president for University Advancement or designee;
vice president for Finance and Support Services or designee; and
others as needed.
An email notification will be sent to the individuals who are required to approve. NOTE: Not all individuals above will see all proposals.
- The associate vice president for Research and Federal Relations, or designee, is responsible for certifying that the proposal is within institutional, state, and federal financial guidelines.
LIAISON FUNCTIONS FOR RESEARCH
ORSP is responsible for liaising with all state, federal, and private sector funding services regarding all aspects of sponsored programs.
University Advancement is responsible for liaising with all corporations, foundations, and private sector funding sources in regard to all aspects of gifts.
Pre-Award Support Services and the associate vice president for Research and Federal Relations will continually assess the advantages associated with the university’s membership in research-related agencies and organizations, and will recommend initiation, renewal, or termination of such membership annually.
ANALYSIS AND REPORTING
- Post-Award Support Services will furnish the associate vice president for Research and Federal Relations with a report regarding funded grant expenditures annually. The report will consist of data gathered to complete the annual National Science Foundation and the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board research reports. Other reports will be made available as needed.
REVIEWER OF THIS PPS
Reviewer of this PPS includes the following:
Position Date Associate Vice President for Research and Federal Relations October 1 ONY
This PPS has been reviewed by the following individuals in their official capacities and represents Texas State Academic Affairs policy and procedure from the date of this document until superseded.
Associate Vice President for Research and Federal Relations; senior reviewer of this PPS
Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs